I spent the morning with graphic designer, Jack, at Lesniewicz. He talked to me a little about how graphic designers really can’t feel as though they’re the best. He talked about how every project is a completely new project, so no matter how well you’ve done with others in the past, each one is a new adventure. This was really intriguing to me. For some reason, I always figured that once you were good, you were good. I also learned about how to make unique designs that still fit in the same “family”. When you have a design already for a booklet, you want the brochures to match them to a certain extent, but still be unique. We talked about embellishments and I noticed different techniques he used while putting together a cover page. Just being able to watch a designer at work gives me ideas about my own work. I also noted that to come up with creative outlooks on designs, artists do a lot of word association. Though the company is using the word one way, their logo or design can express it through another idea. For example, there was a business with the name Roach in it. It had nothing to do with bugs, but they used a roach in the design, because it helped clients remember the name. Thinking of different ways a word can be used will help expand my creative abilities.
I also spent the morning looking through a magazine called Communication Arts. I went through about two and a half issues. The first had all sorts of design from logos to ads to websites. The second was all different forms of advertising like posters, billboards, commercials, brochures, etc. Jack told me that exposing myself to good design would help me weed out the not so good designs. It was interesting to watch him work, because he was working on multiple different designs for the same product. He would work on one and then get sick of it and move on to another. He’d go back and eventually threw out a few because he decided they weren’t good enough. They were barely half done, but when he’d narrowed down a few more, he called in other designers to critique. He wanted to make sure that what he was doing would fit what the client had been asking for before he actually finished the product. They told him he was right on track, but it helped to refocus him by reviewing the client’s desires.
In the afternoon, I went back to school to talk to Meren. We discussed the worksheet I had completed and then talked some more about logos and my potential project. I learned that logos need to be simple, because it must be able to be duplicated. Also, it could be printed in black and white at some point, so color shouldn’t be a main focus. If a logo can be printed small in black and white and still be understood, then it passes these tests. This is to make sure a logo isn’t too complicated and is easy to understand. We also discussed me beginning my project by creating a logo for my winterim experience. I could then advertise my winterim experience through posters, brochures, etc. She recommended I start by going to Barnes and Noble and looking at some logo books, which I did. I read the logo section of D.I.Y. be Ellen Lupton and began reading the Logo, Font, and Lettering Bible by Leslie Cabarga. The former gave a simple list of how to begin creating a logo. Basically, start by listing off characteristics or attributes that relate to your goals for the logo, then find symbols or words that can represent each. The last step is simply to combine a select few of them in many different ways until you’re satisfied. This is a pretty broad procedure, but I’m going to try it. I’ll be returning to Barnes and Noble to continue with the Logo, Font, and Lettering Bible because it looked really interesting.